AXe Skills HubSearch /

← All skills

imi-sponsorship-intelligence

AXe First-party 

Reference: full SKILL.md

Below is the complete skill definition this hub loads when the skill is triggered — what the agent sees as its instructions, verbatim and unabridged.

IMI Sponsorship Intelligence Framework

This skill teaches the AI to evaluate, design, and measure sponsorships the way IMI's

senior strategists do — with rigorous fit assessment, activation-first thinking, and

ROI measurement that goes beyond media equivalency.

IMI's "Live Will Thrive" Philosophy

IMI's foundational belief about sponsorship and experiential marketing:

Live experiences create disproportionate emotional impact. A consumer who experiences

a brand in a live setting (event, activation, sponsorship touchpoint) forms stronger

emotional connections than one who sees the brand in advertising. This is measurable.

But live only works with the right fit. A sponsorship without brand-property fit is

worse than no sponsorship — it confuses consumers and wastes budget.

The three sponsorship questions:

  • FIT — Does this property align with our brand and audience?
  • ACTIVATION — What will we DO with this sponsorship beyond logo placement?
  • RETURN — How will we measure whether it worked?

Stage 1: Fit Assessment

The IMI Fit Framework

Brand-property fit is assessed on four dimensions:

DimensionWeightWhat It Measures
Audience Fit35%Do the brand's audience and the property's audience share passion points and demographics?
Values Fit25%Do the brand's values and the property's associations align?
Category Fit20%Is the brand's category a natural partner for this property type?
Competitive Fit20%Are competitors present? Would this be differentiated?

Audience Fit (using Pulse™)

This is the most data-driven dimension. Use Pulse™ passion point alignment analysis:

from scipy.stats import pearsonr

def audience_fit_score(brand_passion_profile, property_passion_profile):
    """
    Calculate audience fit using passion point index correlation.
    brand_passion_profile: dict of {passion_point: index_score}
    property_passion_profile: dict of {passion_point: index_score}
    """
    common_passions = set(brand_passion_profile.keys()) & set(property_passion_profile.keys())
    brand_vals = [brand_passion_profile[pp] for pp in common_passions]
    property_vals = [property_passion_profile[pp] for pp in common_passions]

    correlation, pvalue = pearsonr(brand_vals, property_vals)

    # Convert to 1-5 score
    if correlation >= 0.70:
        score = 5
    elif correlation >= 0.55:
        score = 4
    elif correlation >= 0.40:
        score = 3
    elif correlation >= 0.25:
        score = 2
    else:
        score = 1

    return {
        'correlation': round(correlation, 3),
        'score': score,
        'common_passion_points': len(common_passions),
        'p_value': round(pvalue, 4)
    }

Values Fit Assessment

Scored qualitatively on a 1-5 scale:

ScoreDescription
5Brand and property share core values — the association feels natural and enhancing
4Strong alignment on most values — minor tensions can be managed
3Moderate alignment — some values match, others are neutral
2Weak alignment — the association may confuse consumers
1Misalignment — the association could damage the brand

Category Fit Assessment

ScoreDescription
5Category is endemic to the property (e.g., sports drink + athletics)
4Category is a natural partner (e.g., beer + music festival)
3Category is neutral — no inherent fit or friction
2Category is unusual for this property — needs strong activation to justify
1Category is at odds with the property (e.g., junk food + health event)

Competitive Fit Assessment

ScoreDescription
5No competitors present — unique positioning opportunity
4Minor competitor presence — brand can still differentiate
3Competitors present but in different activation spaces
2Direct competitor is present — differentiation will be difficult
1Category is owned by a competitor — association may benefit rival

Total Fit Score

def total_fit_score(audience_score, values_score, category_score, competitive_score):
    """
    Calculate weighted fit score.
    All inputs are 1-5 scores.
    """
    total = (
        0.35 * audience_score +
        0.25 * values_score +
        0.20 * category_score +
        0.20 * competitive_score
    )
    return round(total, 2)

# Interpretation:
# 4.0+ = Excellent fit — strong go
# 3.0-3.9 = Good fit — go with activation plan
# 2.0-2.9 = Marginal fit — proceed only with compelling activation strategy
# Below 2.0 = Poor fit — do not proceed

Stage 2: Activation Design

IMI's cardinal rule of sponsorship: Logo placement is not activation.

A sponsorship without activation is a brand tax. The activation is what creates the

consumer experience that drives brand metrics.

The Activation Pyramid

                    ┌──────────────────┐
                    │  ADVOCACY         │  ← Consumers share/recommend the experience
                    │  (WOM, social)    │
                    ├──────────────────┤
                    │  ENGAGEMENT       │  ← Consumers interact with the brand
                    │  (participate,    │
                    │   try, experience)│
                    ├──────────────────┤
                    │  AWARENESS        │  ← Consumers see/notice the brand
                    │  (signage, media) │
                    └──────────────────┘

A good activation strategy has all three levels. Most sponsorships only achieve awareness.

Activation Design Framework

For each sponsorship, design activations across the pyramid:

AWARENESS LAYER:
- On-site signage and branding
- Broadcast/digital media integration
- Social media presence
- Athlete/performer endorsement

ENGAGEMENT LAYER:
- Interactive brand experiences at events
- Product sampling or trial opportunities
- Competitions, challenges, games
- VIP experiences, behind-the-scenes access
- Content creation opportunities for attendees

ADVOCACY LAYER:
- Shareable moments designed for social media
- Referral mechanics (bring a friend)
- User-generated content campaigns
- Community building around shared passion
- Exclusive content for brand + property fans

Activation Scoring

Rate each proposed activation on:

FactorWeightDescription
Brand integration30%How naturally does the brand fit into the activation?
Consumer value30%Does the activation add value to the consumer's experience?
Shareability20%Will consumers talk about / share this?
Measurability20%Can we measure the impact of this activation?

Stage 3: ROI Measurement

The IMI Sponsorship ROI Model

IMI's ROI model goes beyond media equivalency to measure actual brand impact:

Sponsorship ROI Components:

1. AWARENESS IMPACT
   - Brand awareness lift (control vs. exposed)
   - Ad recall / sponsorship recall
   - Brand association with the property

2. ATTITUDINAL IMPACT
   - Brand consideration lift
   - Brand favourability lift
   - Trust / emotional connection lift

3. BEHAVIOURAL IMPACT
   - Purchase intent lift
   - Actual purchase / trial (where measurable)
   - Website / store visit attribution

4. AMPLIFICATION VALUE
   - Word-of-mouth multiplier
   - Social media earned value
   - PR/media earned value

WOM Multiplier

The Word-of-Mouth multiplier measures how many additional people are reached through

attendees sharing their experience:

def wom_multiplier(attendees, avg_conversations, reach_per_conversation,
                   brand_mention_rate, sentiment_positive_rate):
    """
    Calculate the WOM multiplier for a sponsorship activation.

    attendees: number of event attendees
    avg_conversations: average post-event conversations per attendee about the event
    reach_per_conversation: average people reached per conversation
    brand_mention_rate: % of conversations that mention the sponsor brand
    sentiment_positive_rate: % of brand mentions that are positive
    """
    total_conversations = attendees * avg_conversations
    total_reach = total_conversations * reach_per_conversation
    brand_reached = total_reach * brand_mention_rate
    positive_brand_reach = brand_reached * sentiment_positive_rate

    multiplier = positive_brand_reach / attendees

    return {
        'total_conversations': int(total_conversations),
        'total_reach': int(total_reach),
        'brand_mentions_reach': int(brand_reached),
        'positive_brand_reach': int(positive_brand_reach),
        'wom_multiplier': round(multiplier, 1),
        'interpretation': (
            f"Each attendee generates {round(multiplier, 1)} additional positive "
            f"brand impressions through word of mouth"
        )
    }

# Typical benchmarks:
# WOM multiplier 3-5x = Average (logo-only sponsorships)
# WOM multiplier 5-10x = Good (some activation)
# WOM multiplier 10-20x = Strong (excellent activation with shareable moments)
# WOM multiplier 20x+ = Exceptional (viral activation)

Naming Rights Valuation

For naming rights opportunities (stadium, event, series):

Naming Rights Value Components:
1. Media exposure value (broadcast mentions, signage impressions)
2. Brand association transfer (property equity → brand equity)
3. Hospitality / B2B value (corporate entertaining, client hosting)
4. Community goodwill value (local/fan community association)
5. Exclusivity premium (only one brand gets naming rights)

Valuation formula:
  Annual Value = Media Exposure Value × (1 + Association Premium + Hospitality Premium + Exclusivity Premium)

Where:
  Media Exposure Value = estimated annual media impressions × CPM equivalent
  Association Premium = 0.2-0.5 (depending on property strength)
  Hospitality Premium = 0.1-0.3 (depending on hospitality assets)
  Exclusivity Premium = 0.15-0.35 (depending on category competitiveness)

Output Templates

Template: Sponsorship Fit Assessment

## Sponsorship Fit Assessment: [Brand] × [Property]
**Assessment date:** [date] | **Assessor:** [name]

### Fit Scores
| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Weight | Weighted | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience Fit | X | 35% | X.XX | [explanation] |
| Values Fit | X | 25% | X.XX | [explanation] |
| Category Fit | X | 20% | X.XX | [explanation] |
| Competitive Fit | X | 20% | X.XX | [explanation] |
| **TOTAL** | | | **X.XX** | |

### Interpretation
[Excellent / Good / Marginal / Poor] fit — [recommendation]

### Key Risks
1. [risk and mitigation]

### Recommended Activation Direction
[If proceeding — activation themes]

### Essential Insight
[One sentence: should this brand sponsor this property?]

Template: Sponsorship ROI Report

## Sponsorship ROI: [Brand] × [Property] — [Period]
**Investment:** $[amount] | **Attendees/Audience:** [n]

### Impact Summary
| Metric | Control | Exposed | Lift | Sig? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand awareness | X% | X% | +Xpts | Y/N |
| Sponsorship recall | - | X% | - | - |
| Brand consideration | X% | X% | +Xpts | Y/N |
| Purchase intent | X% | X% | +Xpts | Y/N |

### WOM Multiplier
- Multiplier: [X.X]x
- Positive brand reach: [n]

### ROI Calculation
[Show the math]

### Recommendation
[Continue / Modify / Discontinue] — [rationale]

Common Pitfalls

  • Relying on media equivalency alone. Impressions are not impact. A million impressions

that don't move brand metrics are worthless. Always measure attitudinal and behavioural lift.

  • Sponsoring without activating. Logo placement without activation generates awareness

but not engagement or advocacy. The activation IS the sponsorship.

  • Ignoring audience fit. A brand sponsoring a property whose audience doesn't match

theirs is paying to talk to the wrong people.

  • Overvaluing naming rights. Naming rights are only valuable if the brand activates

the association. A name on a building that no one connects to the brand is wasted.

  • Measuring only during the event. Sponsorship impact extends weeks/months beyond the

event through WOM and brand memory. Measure at multiple time points.

Cross-Skill References

  • For audience fit analysis via Pulse™ → imi-pulse-intelligence
  • For brand health pre/post sponsorship → imi-brand-strategy
  • For segmentation of event attendees → imi-segmentation-engine
  • For writing up sponsorship recommendations → imi-client-deliverable
  • For sponsorship as part of a pitch → imi-pitch-intelligence

*Built for IMI International's Local AI — grounded in IMI's "Live Will Thrive" philosophy

and decades of sponsorship strategy across sports, entertainment, and cultural properties.*

*Purpose: Insight. Method: Rigour. Outcome: Profit.*

AXE MCP Server Integration

Every skill in the AXE Skills Hub runs with access to the AXE MCP Server — giving it the full fleet intelligence toolkit automatically. No setup required; tools are available in any AXE-powered session.

Core Tools Available

CategoryToolsUse Case
Memoryread_memory, write_memory, list_memoryPersist context across sessions
Webweb_search, web_fetchLive data, docs, research
File Opsread_file, write_fileRead/write any local file
Fleetfleet_ssh, axe_pushRun commands on JL2/JL3/JL4, send notifications
AI Modelsquery_team_channel, get_partner_stateCross-agent coordination
Dataqdrant_search, qdrant_storeSemantic memory & vector search
Pipelinehydra_addAdd high-quality outputs to Edge training
Skillshub_list_skills, hub_get_skill, hub_search_skills, hub_get_registry, hub_skill_metadataChain skills together
Secretsget_secretRetrieve API keys securely

Quick Start

# In any AXE session, tools are pre-loaded. Example chaining:

# 1. Search for context
results = qdrant_search("user query here", collection="axe_persistent_memory")

# 2. Fetch live data if needed
content = web_fetch("https://docs.example.com/api")

# 3. Write result to memory for next session
write_memory("shared/last_result.md", output)

# 4. Log quality output to Edge training pipeline
hydra_add(prompt=user_query, response=output, score=0.9, source="skill-name")

Edge Training Integration

High-quality skill outputs are automatically eligible for Edge model training via hydra_add. When a response scores ≥0.85 in evals, pipe it to the Hydra pipeline to compound Edge's knowledge. This is how skills make Edge smarter over time.

# After generating a high-quality response:
hydra_add(
    prompt=user_input,
    response=final_output,
    score=0.9,          # eval score
    source="skill-name" # tracks provenance
)

Metadata

Category
Business Intelligence
Tier
community
Version
1.0.0
License
MIT
Path
skills/imi-sponsorship-intelligence/SKILL.md

Use with an agent

Fetch this skill’s definition over the open API — no key required.

curl -s /v1/skills/imi-sponsorship-intelligence

View source ↗